Is it the person in the office that needs to be changed or the authority of the office that is the root of our issues in America today?
Are ‘conservatives’, especially ‘social’, immune to Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely?
Can you be a fiscal conservative without being a social one?
Is a social conservative simply a Moral Socialist?
Are political labels necessary in a Republic under Rule of Law that recognizes Inalienable rights?
Lately I’ve been perusing the Tea Party sites to get an idea of what this movement has become. It seems it started out as a protest to an out of control government (aka unlimited gov’t) and has morphed into an attempt to replace our terrible Rulers with better ones.
This has been shown time and time again to transform the relatively innocent newcomer with Good Intentions into a de facto Aristocrat with unlimited resources by which to ‘do good’ with. The person gets changed, not the system they always promise to change.
If you are interested in restoring Limited Gov’t and a non-Socialized Micro Economic system, speak up and help us find others with the same goal.
The End is FAR,
Steve A. Morris